Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Floriane Clement, Professor Jaime AmezagaORCiD
In many countries worldwide, similar state policies on land management have been implemented as a response to deforestation in mountainous areas. So far, few studies have examined to which extent these policies have actually contributed to reforestation. This is the focus of our analysis, based on a case study in Vietnam. Because land access and land use were traditionally governed by common rules, we examine land use changes from an institutional perspective. We use the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework, coupled with an historical perspective and the analysis of actors' perception and dominant narratives on land management and forests. Results show that national policies significantly interfered with local factors, leading to a complex course of decision-making and action. Substantial reforestation in the area was not a response by farmers to policy incentives but rather the unexpected outcome of the disruption of local institutions by these policies. We argue that, because national interventions have relied on false or exaggerated narratives and beliefs, their implementation is in conflict with the local reality in upland areas, leading to unpredictable and locally dependent outcomes. We defend hence the need for local level studies and also recommend considering local institutions for land use change analysis in contexts where land use systems are characterised by a high degree of human interaction. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Author(s): Clement F, Amezaga JM
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Geoforum
Year: 2008
Volume: 39
Issue: 1
Pages: 265-277
ISSN (print): 0016-7185
ISSN (electronic): 1872-9398
Publisher: Pergamon
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.05.008
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.05.008
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
