Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Sarah Cotterill, Dr Jan DolfingORCiD, Professor Thomas CurtisORCiD, Dr Elizabeth Heidrich
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
© 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. The potential benefits of applying microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) technology to wastewater treatment are clear and profound. Previous pilot studies have demonstrated a 'proof of concept' with domestic waste at ambient temperatures, but have not yet treated waste to required discharge standards, and have not reached energy neutrality. In addition, these reactors have been many orders of magnitude smaller than would be needed for full scale wastewater treatment plants. Scale-up affects many of the parameters that underpin performance; understanding its impact will be vital to further progress. Modifying a previously tested cassette-style design, we reduced the internal resistance, and increased the module size by a factor of 16, constructing an MEC with six 1 m2 anodes. This created an anodic surface area to volume ratio of 34 m2 m-3. The system was operated at a hydraulic retention time of 5 hours on settled domestic wastewater for 217 days, producing more current than a scaled-down reactor, which was run in parallel. The large MEC produced 0.8 L of 93% pure H2 d-1 at ambient winter temperatures (11.4 ± 2.5°C). Chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal averaged 63.5% with an average effluent quality of 124.7 mgCOD L-1, achieving the European Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (1991) consent.
Author(s): Cotterill SE, Dolfing J, Jones C, Curtis TP, Heidrich ES
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Fuel Cells
Year: 2017
Volume: 17
Issue: 5
Pages: 584-592
Print publication date: 01/10/2017
Online publication date: 01/06/2017
Acceptance date: 08/05/2017
Date deposited: 20/06/2017
ISSN (print): 1615-6846
ISSN (electronic): 1615-6854
Publisher: Wiley - VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA
URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.201700034
DOI: 10.1002/fuce.201700034
Data Access Statement: http://dx.doi.org/10.17634/154300-49
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric