Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Diana Paton
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Previous analyses of the punishment of slaves in the British colonies have concentrated on the period after 1780. This article uses the mid-eighteenth-century records of the slave court of the parish of St. Andrew, Jamaica, to analyze the crimes for which slaves were prosecuted and the judicial punishments they received. Prosecutions concentrated heavily on a few offences, especially theft and running away. Punishments were severe and were largely concerned with the slave's body; they included death, flogging, transportation, and bodily mutilation. Some punishments made use of the cotton tree, which figured significantly in Afro-Jamaican cosmology, suggesting that the authorities were trying to harness or combat the power of obeah. The article compares the Jamaican slave court's practice to that of British courts in the same period, as well as to the experience of slaves under other jurisdictions. The slave court enacted rituals that both dramatized and sustained power relations, but rather than representing the supposed common discipline of all to a single rule of law, as did the contemporary British spectacle of trial and punishment, the Jamaican court's practice emphasized the difference between enslaved and free, valorizing the private penal power of the master under slavery.
Author(s): Paton D
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Social History
Year: 2001
Volume: 34
Issue: 4
Pages: 923-+
ISSN (print): 0022-4529
ISSN (electronic): 1527-1897
Publisher: George Mason University
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jsh.2001.0066
DOI: 10.1353/jsh.2001.0066
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric