Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Nonequivalence of on-line and paper-and-pencil psychological tests: The case of the prospective memory questionnaire

Lookup NU author(s): Emerita Professor Jacqueline Rodgers

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

There is growing evidence that Internet-mediated psychological tests can have satisfactory psychometric properties and can measure the same constructs as traditional versions. However, equivalence cannot be taken for granted. The prospective memory questionnaire (PMQ; Hannon, Adams, Harrington, Fries-Dias, & Gibson, 1995) was used in an on-line study exploring links between drug use and memory (Rodgers et al., 2003). The PMQ has four factor-analytically derived subscales. In a large (N = 763) sample tested via the Internet, only two factors could be recovered; the other two subscales were essentially meaningless. This demonstration of nonequivalence underlines the importance of on-line test validation. Without examination of its psychometric properties, one cannot be sure that a test administered via the Internet actually measures the intended construct. Copyright 2005 Psychonomic Society, Inc.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Buchanan T, Ali T, Heffernan TM, Ling J, Parrott AC, Rodgers J, Scholey AB

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Behavior Research Methods

Year: 2005

Volume: 37

Issue: 1

Pages: 148-154

Print publication date: 01/02/2005

ISSN (print): 1554-351X

ISSN (electronic): 1554-3528

Publisher: Psychonomic Society, Inc.

PubMed id: 16097355


Share