Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Matthew GortonORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
While all Central and East European countries have reformed their relationships between agriculture and the state, this process has been particularly fraught in Moldova. The post-Soviet era has witnessed a sustained conflict between communists, agrarian nationalists, and economic liberals over the reform of state and collective farms. However, attempts to enact agrarian nationalist and neoliberal visions of agriculture in Moldova have largely failed. Instead, reforms have created a subsistence-based agricultural sector with a fragmented pattern of land management and have not dealt with trade reorientation. Collective farm managers, while portrayed as impediments to efficiency, private sector agriculture prior to decollectivisation, have become the main agents of much-needed land consolidation after reform. The plans for decollectivisation, pioneered by international agencies, placed too little emphasis on creating institutions to inhibit excessive fragmentation as part of the reform process in itself and are only now facing these problems after the dramatic rise in subsistence production.
Author(s): Gorton M, White J
Publication type: Review
Publication status: Published
Journal: East European Politics and Societies
Year: 2003
Volume: 17
Issue: 2
Pages: 305-351
Print publication date: 01/03/2003
ISSN (print): 0888-3254
ISSN (electronic): 1533-8371
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0888325403017002006
DOI: 10.1177/0888325403017002006