Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Shaun Parsons, Professor Philip Barker, Alan Armstrong
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Senior lecturers/lecturers in mental health nursing (11 in round one, nine in round two, and eight in the final round) participated in a three-round Delphi study into the teaching of health care ethics (HCE) to students of nursing. The participants were drawn from six (round one) and four (round three) UK universities. Information was gathered on the organization, methods used and content of HCE modules. Questionnaire responses were transcribed and the content analysed for patterns of interest and areas of convergence or divergence. Findings include: the majority (72.8%) of the sample believed that insufficient time was allocated to the teaching of HCE; case studies were considered a popular, although problematic, teaching method; the 'four principles' approach was less than dominant in the teaching of HCE; and virtue ethics was taught by only 36.4% of the participants. The Delphi technique proved adequate and worth while for the purposes of this study. Further empirical research could aim to replicate or contradict these findings, using a larger sample and recruiting more university departments. Reflection is required on several issues, including the depth and breadth to which ethics theory and, more controversially, meta-ethics, are taught to nursing students.
Author(s): Armstrong AE; Barker PJ; Parsons S
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Nursing Ethics
Year: 2001
Volume: 8
Issue: 1
Pages: 45-56
ISSN (print): 0969-7330
ISSN (electronic): 1477-0989
Publisher: Sage Publications
URL: http://nej.sagepub.com/content/8/1/45.abstract
DOI: 10.1191/096973301673339218
PubMed id: 16010908
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric