Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Richard Hull
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
It is a common argument that ICTs have enabled a new epoch in which information and knowledge play a central role, economically, socially and politically. This paper suggests that such arguments – despite any ‘radical’ intentions – are in danger of perpetuating neo-liberalism by promoting government intervention into the production and use of information and knowledge. It argues (1) ‘Knowledge’ as a unit of analysis was linked to the emergence of neo-liberal theories in 1930s. (2) Those theories used what were apparently ‘problems’ with knowledge to justify markets. (3) They also entailed a paradoxical coupling of ‘post-positivist’ epistemology with sovereign ethics. (4) That coupling was apparent in the social science input to ICT development from late 1950s. (5) Social science analysis of ICTs then mistakenly extrapolated from the specific to the general. (6) Current social & political theory which utilises ‘knowledge’ or ‘information’ as units of analysis must deploy the same paradoxical coupling, and hence run the risk of perpetuating neo-liberalism.
Author(s): Hull R
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Bridges: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Theology, Philosophy, History and Science
Year: 2001
Volume: 8
Issue: 3/4
Pages: 223-242
Print publication date: 01/10/2001
ISSN (print): 1042-2234
Publisher: Bridges
URL: http://www2.smumn.edu/bridges/
Notes: Paper publically available here: http://homepages.3-c.coop/richard/Hull_ICTs,%20Knoweldge%20Economy%20and%20Neo-Liberalism.pdf