Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Kristin HusseyORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This article explores how scientists make and feel time in the context of the chronobiological laboratory. Like other scholars who have tracked the temporal regimes of scientific knowledge making, I am interested in the kinds of times produced in and around experiments performed by the scientists who study circadian rhythms. During gruelling ‘time point’ experiments, chronobiologists attempt to mould their own rhythmic, biological bodies to a scientific temporality that emphasises exactness and regularity to facilitate almost continuous data collection. Within this complex ‘timescape’, scientists tinker with time itself in order to navigate the multiple temporalities produced by their research. They deploy a scientific time convention known as ‘Z-Time’ or ‘zeitgeber time’ as a method of ‘time work’ that allows them to customise the temporal experience of their working lives and their experimental subjects, lab mice. I argue that a case study of the chronobiology lab questions the extent to which time can be ‘worked’ in the context of biological research. I explore what the tension between scientific and embodied times can tell us about the role of temporality in making ‘good science’ and the ‘emotional culture’ that time point experiments foster among chronobiologists.
Author(s): Hussey KD
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Time & Society
Year: 2024
Volume: 33
Issue: 3
Pages: 307-330
Print publication date: 01/08/2024
Online publication date: 05/07/2023
Acceptance date: 14/02/2023
ISSN (print): 0961-463X
ISSN (electronic): 1461-7463
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd
URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X231184083
DOI: 10.1177/0961463X231184083
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
