Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Validation of the familial chylomicronaemia syndrome (FCS) score in an ethnically diverse cohort from UK FCS registry: Implications for diagnosis and differentiation from multifactorial chylomicronaemia syndrome (MCS)

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Fiona Jenkinson

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2024 Elsevier B.V.Background and aims: Prognosis and management differ between familial chylomicronaemia syndrome (FCS), a rare autosomal recessive disorder, and multifactorial chylomicronaemia syndrome (MCS) or severe mixed hyperlipidaemia. A clinical scoring tool to differentiate these conditions has been devised but not been validated in other populations. The objective of this study was to validate this score in the UK population and identify any additional factors that might improve it. Methods: A retrospective validation study was conducted using data from 151 patients comprising 75 FCS and 76 MCS patients. All participants had undergone genetic testing for genes implicated in FCS. Validation was performed by standard methods. Additional variables were identified from clinical data by logistic regression analysis. Results: At the recommended FCS score threshold ≥10 points, the sensitivity and specificity of the score in the UK population were 96% and 75%, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83–0.94, p < 0.001). This study identified non-European (predominantly South Asian) ethnicity, parental consanguinity, body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m2, and recurrent pancreatitis as additional positive predictors, while BMI >30 kg/m2 was found to be a negative predictor for FCS. However, inclusion of additional FCS predictors had no significant impact on performance of standard FCS score. Conclusions: Our study validates the FCS score in the UK population to distinguish FCS from MCS. While additional FCS predictors were identified, they did not improve further the score diagnostic performance.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Bashir B, Kwok S, Wierzbicki AS, Jones A, Dawson C, Downie P, Jenkinson F, Delaney H, Mansfield M, Datta D, Teoh Y, Hamilton P, Forrester N, O'Sullivan D, Ferdousi M, Durrington PN, AbdelRazik A, Gallo A, Moulin P, Soran H

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Atherosclerosis

Year: 2024

Volume: 391

Print publication date: 01/04/2024

Online publication date: 09/02/2024

Acceptance date: 02/02/2024

ISSN (print): 0021-9150

ISSN (electronic): 1879-1484

Publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.117476

DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.117476

PubMed id: 38447437


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share