Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Treating subclinical hypothyroidism in individuals with or without mental health problems –A Delphi based expert consensus study in two countries

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Salman Razvi

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

Copyright © 2023 Lieber, Van Der Feltz-Cornelis, Razvi, Moriarty, Wilkes, Ott, Mannchen, Eliasson and Werneke.Background: Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is a common endocrine problem with prevalence estimates between 4% and 20%. Symptoms are often non-specific but can substantially affect well-being leading to repeated medical consultations. The effect of thyroid hormone replacement therapy (THRT) in patients with SCH remains uncertain. Current guidelines, limited by the lack of high-quality evidence, have been controversial with limited adherence in clinical practice. Methods: Three-round modified Delphi method to establish consensus regarding diagnosis and treatment of individuals with SCH with and without affective disorder or anxiety, conducted with clinicians from three specialties, general practice, endocrinology and psychiatry, and two countries, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Results: Sixty clinicians, 20 per specialty, were recruited. Fifty-three (88%) participants completed all three rounds. The participants reached consensus on five of the 26 practice statements that (a) repeated testing was required for the diagnosis of subclinical hypothyroidism, (b) antibody screening should usually occur, and (c and d) antibody screening would strengthen the indication for thyroid hormone replacement therapy in both individuals with or without affective disorder or anxiety. The participants disagreed with (e) a requirement of a TSH threshold ≥ 20 mIU/L for thyroid hormone replacement therapy start. Psychiatrists and GPs but not endocrinologists, agreed that there was a frequent discrepancy between laboratory results and clinical symptoms, and disagreed that testing for thyroid dysfunction was overused in patients presenting with depression or anxiety, or fatigue. Conclusions: In many aspects, attitudes toward diagnosing and treating SCH remain diverse. The inability of our Delphi panel to achieve consensus on most items and the disagreement with a TSH ≥ 20 mIU/L threshold for treatment suggest that the concept of SCH may need rethinking with a better understanding of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid physiology. Given that the scientific evidence is currently not conclusive, guidelines in this area should not be taken as definitive.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Lieber I, Van Der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Razvi S, Moriarty AS, Wilkes S, Ott M, Mannchen J, Eliasson M, Werneke U

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Frontiers in Endocrinology

Year: 2023

Volume: 14

Online publication date: 12/07/2023

Acceptance date: 19/06/2023

Date deposited: 08/09/2023

ISSN (electronic): 1664-2392

Publisher: Frontiers Media SA

URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1204842

DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1204842

Data Access Statement: The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Department of Psychiatry, Sunderby Hospital, Luleå, Sweden
NLL 941718
NLL-969485
Region Norrbotten, Research and Education Department
Umeå University
VISARE NORR (Northern County Councils Regional Federation Fund)
VISARENORR968201

Share