Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Florian ZollmannORCiD
This is the authors' accepted manuscript of an article that has been published in its final definitive form by Routledge, 2022.
For re-use rights please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
Consensus regarding what becomes mainstream, popular, and commonplace within academia is subtly managed in accord with conformity of thought, contemporary popular ideas, and major assumptions/paradigms predominating fields, which in turn are comprised of hegemonic, ideological ideas, frameworks and arguments that are informed and bound by power. Power, professionalisation, and dominant ideological currents inform and legitimise paradigmatic ideas, which in turn influence perceptions and reception. This paper explores how Communication Studies have been impacted by dominant configurations of power and encourages debate on the extent to which ideological bias and ideological marginalisation are normative dimensions of Communication Studies.
Author(s): Klaehn J, Zollmann F, Kahn M
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Javnost - The Public
Year: 2022
Volume: 29
Issue: 4
Pages: 337-353
Online publication date: 20/06/2022
Acceptance date: 28/03/2022
Date deposited: 20/06/2022
ISSN (print): 1318-3222
ISSN (electronic): 1854-8377
Publisher: Routledge
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2022.2079055
DOI: 10.1080/13183222.2022.2079055
ePrints DOI: 10.57711/5tqj-ch81
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric