Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Are treatment effects consistent with hypothesized mechanisms of action proposed for postoperative delirium interventions? Reanalysis of systematic reviews

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Iain McCullagh

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2021 The Authors.Aim: Postoperative delirium (POD) is associated with increased morbidity and is poorly understood. The aim of this review was to identify putative mechanisms through re-analysis of randomized trials on treatment or prevention of POD. Materials &methods: A systematic review was performed to identify systematic reviews of treatments for POD. Constituent randomized controlled trials were identified, and interventions were grouped according to hypothesized mechanisms of action. Effects were meta-analyzed by hypothesized mechanism and timing of intervention. Results: A total of 116 randomized controlled trials described 47 individual interventions for POD, with nine mechanisms identified. The largest effects were observed for postoperative inflammation reduction, and preoperative reinforcement of sleep-wake cycle. Conclusion: This approach identifies treatments focused on mechanisms of action that may be front runners for future trials and interventions.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Boxell EG, Malik Y, Wong J, Lee MH, Berntsson HM, Lee MJ, Bourne RS, McCullagh IJ, Hind D, Wilson MJ

Publication type: Review

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Year: 2021

Volume: 10

Issue: 17

Pages: 1301-1315

Print publication date: 01/12/2021

Online publication date: 29/09/2021

Acceptance date: 23/08/2021

ISSN (print): 2042-6305

ISSN (electronic): 2042-6313

Publisher: Future Medicine Ltd.

URL: https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2021-0161

DOI: 10.2217/cer-2021-0161

PubMed id: 34585622


Share