Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Mark WhittinghamORCiD, Dr Ailsa McKenzie, Dr Richard Francksen, Dr Matthew Grainger, Nadheer Fazaa, Caroline Rhymer, Pauline Lloyd, Dr Gavin StewartORCiD, Dr Elizabeth Oughton
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
© 2020 British Trust for Ornithology. In this reply, we confirm that the results of the original paper are robust and that our conclusions were correct: densities of Ruddy Turnstones Arenaria interpres were lower on sites located further from undisturbed refuges. There are two points of learning here: (i) taking the findings of a paper based purely on what is published is normal but there is an unpublished iterative process for analysis that is often hidden from a reader (described here), so we refute that our results were caused by chance; (ii) we published a result based on an incorrect method in the revision process. We hope that other researchers involved in long-term projects involving large and complex datasets can learn from our mistake, as we will endeavour to do.
Author(s): Whittingham MJ, McKenzie AJ, Francksen RM, Feige D, Cadwallender T, Grainger M, Fazaa N, Rhymer C, Wilkinson C, Lloyd P, Smurthwaite B, Percival SM, Morris-Hale T, Rawcliffe C, Dewson C, Woods S, Stewart GB, Oughton E
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Bird Study
Year: 2020
Volume: 67
Issue: 2
Pages: 264-267
Online publication date: 22/09/2020
Acceptance date: 03/09/2020
ISSN (print): 0006-3657
ISSN (electronic): 1944-6705
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2020.1820447
DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2020.1820447
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric