Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Mabel LieORCiD, Professor Steve RobsonORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
Objective:We present qualitative findings from interviews with frontline clinicians and service users of a fetal telemedicineservice.Methods:Semi-structured interviews with clinical stakeholders and service users were conducted, undertaken as part of aservice evaluation. Data collection was undertaken by different teams, using interview schedules aligned to independentevaluation aims. Data were subjected to thematic analysis.Results:Sonographers reported four main challenges: delivering a shared consultation; the requirement to resist scanningintuitively; communications during the scan; and restricted room space. Notwithstanding, all clinicians reported thatparticipating women were accepting of the technology. Service users reported few concerns. The main benefits of fetaltelemedicine were identified as upskilled staff, increased access to specialist support and improved management ofcomplex pregnancies. Convenience was identified as the main benefit by service users, including savings in time andmoney from not having to travel, take time off work, and arrange childcare.Conclusions:Service users and clinical stakeholders were accepting of the service. Service users reported satisfaction withcommunications during the consultation and awareness that telemedicine had facilitated local access to clinical expertise.Whilst clinical stakeholders reported challenges, the iterative nature of the evaluation meant that concerns were discussed,responded to, and overcome as the pilot developed. Clinical stakeholders’ perception of benefits for service users encour-aged their acceptance. Moreover, the evaluation established that fetal ultrasound telemedicine is a viable method to accessexpertise safely and remotely. It provided demonstrable evidence of a potential solution to some of the healthcarechallenges facing rural hospitals. Objective: We present qualitative findings from interviews with frontline clinicians and service users of a fetal telemedicine service.Methods: Semi-structured interviews with clinical stakeholders and service users were conducted, undertaken as part of a service evaluation. Data collection was undertaken by different teams, using interview schedules aligned to independent evaluation aims. Data were subjected to thematic analysis.Results: Sonographers reported four main challenges: delivering a shared consultation; the requirement to resist scanning intuitively; communications during the scan; and restricted room space. Notwithstanding, all clinicians reported that participating women were accepting of the technology. Service users reported few concerns. The main benefits of fetal telemedicine were identified as upskilled staff, increased access to specialist support and improved management of complex pregnancies. Convenience was identified as the main benefit by service users, including savings in time and money from not having to travel, take time off work, and arrange childcare.Conclusions: Service users and clinical stakeholders were accepting of the service. Service users reported satisfaction with communications during the consultation and awareness that telemedicine had facilitated local access to clinical expertise. Whilst clinical stakeholders reported challenges, the iterative nature of the evaluation meant that concerns were discussed, responded to, and overcome as the pilot developed. Clinical stakeholders’ perception of benefits for service users encouraged their acceptance. Moreover, the evaluation established that fetal ultrasound telemedicine is a viable method to access expertise safely and remotely. It provided demonstrable evidence of a potential solution to some of the healthcare challenges facing rural hospitals.
Author(s): Bidmead E, Lie M, Marshall A, Robson S, Smith VJ
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Digital Health
Year: 2020
Volume: 6
Pages: 1-12
Print publication date: 01/01/2020
Online publication date: 14/05/2020
Acceptance date: 01/04/2020
Date deposited: 18/05/2020
ISSN (electronic): 2055-2076
Publisher: Sage Publications
URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620925929
DOI: 10.1177/2055207620925929
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
