Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Effect of time of day and specialty on polyp detection rates in Australia

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Alastair BurtORCiD

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2018 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. Background and Aim: Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important quality metric in colonoscopy. However, there is conflicting evidence around factors that influence ADR. This study aims to investigate the effect of time of day and endoscopist background on ADR and sessile serrated adenoma/polyp detection rate (SSA/P-DR) for screening colonoscopies. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy in 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Primary outcome was the effect of time of day and endoscopist specialty on screening ADR. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of the same factors on SSA/P-DR and other metrics and collinearity of ADR and SSA/P-DR. Linear regression models were used for association between ADR, time of day, and endoscopist background. Bowel preparation, endoscopist, session, patient age, and gender were adjusted for. Linear regression model was also used for comparing ADR and SSA/P-DR. Chi-square was used for difference of proportions. Results: Two thousand six hundred fifty-seven colonoscopies, of which 558 were screening colonoscopies, were performed. The adjusted mean ADR (screening) was 36.8% in the morning compared with 30.5% in the afternoon (P < 0.0001) and was 36.8% for gastroenterologists compared with 30.4% for surgeons (P < 0.0001). For every 1-h delay in commencing the procedure, there was a reduction in mean ADR by 3.4%. Using a linear regression model, a statistically significant positive association was found between ADR and SSA/P-DR (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Morning and afternoon sessions and gastroenterologists and surgeons achieved the minimum standards recommended for ADR. Afternoon lists and surgeons were associated with a lower ADR compared with morning and gastroenterologists, respectively. Additionally, SSA/P-DR showed collinearity with ADR.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Zorron Cheng Tao Pu L, Lu K, Ovenden A, Rana K, Singh G, Krishnamurthi S, Edwards S, Wilson B, Nakamura M, Yamamura T, Ruszkiewicz A, Hirooka Y, Burt AD, Singh R

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Year: 2019

Volume: 34

Issue: 5

Pages: 899-906

Print publication date: 01/05/2019

Online publication date: 14/12/2018

Acceptance date: 03/12/2018

ISSN (print): 0815-9319

ISSN (electronic): 1440-1746

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia

URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14566

DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14566

PubMed id: 30552716


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share