Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Melissa BatesonORCiD, Professor Daniel Nettle
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
© 2019 Godsell, Randle, Bateson and Nettle.Experimentally inducing low subjective socioeconomic status (SSES) increases food consumption in standardized eating opportunities. Separately, food insecurity (FI) has also been shown to be associated with increased food consumption when a free eating opportunity is provided. Here, we assigned 123 adult volunteers to a low-SSES manipulation or a control condition, followed by an opportunity to consume snack foods. We measured FI prior to the experiment. Thus, our experiment served to replicate the effects of SSES and of FI on consumption, and also to establish whether these effects combine additively or interactively. The low-SSES manipulation increased food consumption, but only among participants who were food secure at baseline. Among food-insecure participants, the effect was reversed. This interaction was not predicted a priori and is presented as an exploratory finding. We also found evidence that both SSES and FI affected the hedonic evaluation of the snack foods, though the changes in evaluation did not mediate the changes in consumption. Our findings suggest that both FI and low SSES affect the consumption and evaluation of food. Their combined effects on consumption may be complex.
Author(s): Godsell S, Randle M, Bateson M, Nettle D
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Frontiers in Psychology
Year: 2019
Volume: 10
Online publication date: 14/08/2019
Acceptance date: 31/07/2019
Date deposited: 02/10/2019
ISSN (electronic): 1664-1078
Publisher: Frontiers Research Foundation
URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01886
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01886
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
