Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Stephen Clark
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved. OBJECTIVES: After a panel process, recommendations on the use of sutureless and rapid deployment valves in aortic valve replacement were given with special respect as an alternative to stented valves. METHODS: Thirty-one international experts in both sutureless, rapid deployment valves and stented bioprostheses constituted the panel. After a thorough literature review, evidence-based recommendations were rated in a three-step modified Delphi approach by the experts. RESULTS: Literature research could identify 67 clinical trials, 4 guidelines and 10 systematic reviews for detailed text analysis to obtain a total of 28 recommendations. After rating by the experts, 12 recommendations were identified and degree of consensus for each was determined. Proctoring and education are necessary for the introduction of sutureless valves on an institutional basis as well as for the individual training of surgeons. Sutureless and rapid deployment should be considered as the valve prosthesis of first choice for isolated procedures in patients with comorbidities, old age, delicate aortic wall conditions such as calcified root, porcelain aorta or prior implantation of aortic homograft and stentless valves as well as for concomitant procedures and small aortic roots to reduce cross-clamp time. Intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography is highly recommended, and in case of right anterior thoracotomy, preoperative computer tomography is strongly recommended. Suitable annular sizes are 19-27 mm. There is a contraindication for bicuspid valves only for Type 0 and for annular abscess or destruction due to infective endocarditis. Careful but complete decalcification of the aortic root is recommended to avoid paravalvular leakage; extensive decalcification should be avoided not to create annular defects. Proximal anastomoses of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting should be placed during a single aortic cross-clamp period or alternatively with careful side clamping. Available evidence suggests that the use of sutureless and rapid deployment valve is associated with (can translate into) reduced early complications such as prolonged ventilation, blood transfusion, atrial fibrillation, pleural effusions and renal replacement therapy, respectively, and may result in reduced intensive care unit and hospital stay in comparison with traditional valves. CONCLUSION: The international experts recommend various benefits of sutureless and rapid deployment technology, which may represent a helpful tool in aortic valve replacement for patients requiring a biological valve. However, further evidence will be needed to reaffirm the benefit of sutureless and rapid deployment valves.
Author(s): Gersak B, Fischlein T, Folliguet TA, Meuris B, Teoh KHT, Moten SC, Solinas M, Miceli A, Oberwalder PJ, Rambaldini M, Bhatnagar G, Borger MA, Bouchard D, Bouchot O, Clark SC, Dapunt OE, Ferrarini M, Laufer G, Mignosa C, Millner R, Noirhomme P, Pfeiffer S, Ruyra-Baliarda X, Shrestha M, Suri RM, Troise G, Diegeler A, Laborde F, Laskar M, Najm HK, Glauber M
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
Year: 2016
Volume: 49
Issue: 3
Pages: 709-718
Print publication date: 01/03/2016
Online publication date: 29/10/2015
Acceptance date: 22/09/2015
ISSN (print): 1010-7940
ISSN (electronic): 1873-734X
Publisher: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
URL: http://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv369
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv369
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
