Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor David Leaper
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Background: Intra-operative surgical site irrigation (lavage) is common practice in surgical procedures in general, with all disciplines advocating some form of irrigation before incision closure. This practice, however, has been neither standardized nor is there compelling evidence that it effectively reduces the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). This narrative review addresses the laboratory and clinical evidence that is available to support the practice of irrigation of the abdominal cavity and superficial/deep incisional tissues, using specific irrigation solutions at the end of an operative procedure to reduce the microbial burden at wound closure. Methods: Review of PubMed and OVID for pertinent, scientific, and clinical publications in the English language was performed. Results: Incision irrigation was found to afford a three-fold benefit: First, to hydrate the bed; second, to assist in allowing better examination of the area immediately before closure; and finally, by removing superficial and deep incisional contamination and lowering the bioburden, expedite the healing process. The clinical practice of intra-operative peritoneal lavage is highly variable and is dependent solely on surgeon preference. By contrast, intra-operative irrigation after device-related procedures has become a standard of care for the prophylaxis of acute peri-prosthetic infection. The clinical evidence that supports the use of antibiotic irrigation is limited and based on retrospective analysis and few acceptable randomized controlled trials. The results of laboratory and animal studies using aqueous 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate are favorable, suggesting that further studies are justified to determine its clinical efficacy. Conclusion: The adoption of appropriate and standardized intra-operative irrigation practices into peri-operative care bundles, which include other evidence-based strategies (weight-based antimicrobial prophylaxis, antimicrobial sutures, maintenance of normothermia, and glycemic control), offers an inexpensive and effective method to reduce the risk of post-operative SSI and deserves further evaluation.
Author(s): Edmiston CE, Leaper DJ
Publication type: Review
Publication status: Published
Journal: Surgical Infections
Year: 2016
Volume: 17
Issue: 6
Pages: 656-664
Print publication date: 01/12/2016
Online publication date: 27/09/2016
Acceptance date: 01/01/1900
ISSN (print): 1096-2964
ISSN (electronic): 1557-8674
Publisher: MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/sur.2016.158
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2016.158
