Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor David Marlow, Kevin Richardson
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
A previous paper on RIS3 assessed its potential to influence growth strategies and their delivery. It held that significant further investment work was needed in tools and techniques, data and intelligence, and innovation in leadership capacity and capabilities. It further asserted that such investment was needed to be part of a commitment to a long-run learning and evaluation process. This paper considers synergies and dissonances between these national approaches to development in England. In particular, it explores how far RIS represents a step change from previous approaches to innovation-led growth. Alternatively, is it more accurately an incremental facelift and rebranding of previous orthodoxies? Does it add value to or detract from national policy for England? What roles might the approach play in the so-called devolution revolution'? Can the (small scale, light touch') Advisory Hub approach support and promote those roles? What, if anything, might the England experience have for other nations and regions of Europe?
Author(s): Marlow D, Richardson K
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: European Planning Studies
Year: 2016
Volume: 24
Issue: 8
Pages: 1478-1493
Print publication date: 01/08/2016
Online publication date: 19/05/2016
Acceptance date: 12/04/2016
ISSN (print): 0965-4313
ISSN (electronic): 1469-5944
Publisher: Routledge
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1179267
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1179267
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric