Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Daniel ZizzoORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
We analyze lottery-choice data in a way that separately estimates the effects of risk aversion and complexity aversion. Complexity is represented by the number of different outcomes in the lottery. A finite mixture random effects model is estimated which assumes that a proportion of the population are complexity-neutral. We find that around 33% of the population are complexity-neutral, around 50% complexity-averse, and the remaining 17% are complexity-loving. Subjects who do react to complexity appear to have a bias towards complexity aversion at the start of the experiment, but complexity aversion reduces with experience, to the extent that the average subject is (almost) complexity neutral by the end of the experiment. Complexity aversion is found to increase with age and to be higher for non-UK students than for UK students. We also find some evidence that, when evaluating complex lotteries, subjects perceive probabilities in accordance with Prospective Reference Theory.
Author(s): Moffatt P, Sitzia S, Zizzo DJ
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Year: 2015
Volume: 51
Issue: 2
Pages: 147-170
Print publication date: 01/10/2015
Online publication date: 13/11/2015
Acceptance date: 21/08/2015
Date deposited: 22/11/2015
ISSN (print): 0895-5646
ISSN (electronic): 1573-0476
Publisher: Springer
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11166-015-9226-3
DOI: 10.1007/s11166-015-9226-3
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric