Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Jingqi Zhu
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Leading business and management journals claim to be ‘world-leading’ but are dominated by Anglo-American scholars. The extent of this domination is demonstrated graphically in this article through cartograms based on 2010/2011 authorship and editorship data in top management journals. The dramatically skewed production of management scholarship is both ethically problematic in terms of Anglo-American domination of leading journals and the exclusion of many developing regions, and anachronistic given the shift of global production away from the North Atlantic in recent years. This continuing neo-colonial domination of intellectual production underpins the inequitable organization of the global economy and specifically the disproportionate realisation of wealth in the global North at the expense of the global South. The article proposes a series of measures to begin redressing the imbalance.
Author(s): Murphy J, Zhu J
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Organization
Year: 2012
Volume: 19
Issue: 6
Pages: 915-927
Print publication date: 01/11/2012
Online publication date: 11/10/2012
ISSN (print): 1350-5084
ISSN (electronic): 1461-7323
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508412453097
DOI: 10.1177/1350508412453097
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric