Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Emeritus Professor Anders Holmberg
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This paper analyzes English ‘‘wh-slifting’’ sentences (for example, How old is she do you think). We argue that these sentences are not scope-marking constructions nor are they derived by simple clausal pied-piping as an alternative to wh-extraction. We show that such sentences are akin to declarative slifting sentences, but more restricted than the latter particularly in the kinds of evidential predicates they co-occur with. We argue that the slifted question is not first merged as the complement of the main clause, but that the relationship between the two clauses is mediated by an evidential morpheme, which takes the do you think-clause as its specifier. This analysis, which explains several properties of wh-slifting that distinguish it from scope-marking constructions and Basque-type clausal pied-piping, partially reconciles wh-slifting questions with paratactic approaches to quotative constructions
Author(s): Haddican W, Holmberg A, Tanaka H, Tsoulas G
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Lingua
Year: 2014
Volume: 138
Pages: 86-106
Print publication date: 26/11/2013
ISSN (print): 0024-3841
ISSN (electronic): 1872-6135
Publisher: Elsevier BV
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.006
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.006
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric