Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Peter Fawcett, Dr Ian Schofield
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate whether experienced physicians' electrodiagnostic practice and criteria can be influenced by international collaboration involving peer review medical audit. Methods: Data was obtained from the ESTEEM project, an ongoing collaboration since 1991 among European neurophysiologists concerned with quality improvement in electrodiagnostic medicine. Three sets of the physicians' polyneuropathy examinations performed with intervals of 2-4 years were analysed. Results: Changes towards increased homogeneity among the physicians were found in (1) the average number of studies performed per patient and the number of abnormal studies required for accepting the diagnosis of polyneuropathy, with the most pronounced changes seen for abnormal motor nerve segments, abnormal F-wave studies, and electromyographic studies, and (2) the agreement on pathophysiological interpretation of nerve conduction studies and classification of polyneuropathy. Conclusions: Changes towards increased homogeneity contributed to years of participation in peer review medical audit, were seen among a group of experienced physicians. Peer review medical audit as carried out here is however difficult to scale up. Therefore guidelines or minimal criteria should ideally supplement a medical audit process to disseminate the results obtained to a larger audience. Significance: These results support the role of international peer review medical audit in quality improvement of electrodiagnostic medicine. (C) 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Author(s): Pugdahl K, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Tankisi H, Johnsen B, de Carvalho M, Fawcett PRW, Labarre-Vila A, Liguori R, Nix W, Schofield IS
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Clinical Neurophysiology
Year: 2011
Volume: 122
Issue: 12
Pages: 2523-2529
Print publication date: 23/06/2011
ISSN (print): 1388-2457
ISSN (electronic): 1872-8952
Publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2011.05.018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.05.018
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric