Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Kati Blom
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The review addresses the question of the relevance of using psychoanalysis in analysing works of architecture. The review also argues that the authors of Nature and Space did not, wrongly, defined, how they used the main concept, e.g. the word "nature". Is is not problematized because the Le Corbusier's and Aalto's early experiences in nature are seen as justification to use the concept and apply psychoanalytical approach and development theory to the lives and work of both men. In spite of these blind spots in the argumentation, the book shows, the boarder and deeper the architectural artefacts are, the boarder range of forms of analysis they allow or ask for.
Author(s): Blom K
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Arkkitehti: The Finnish Architectural review
Year: 2003
Volume: 100
Issue: 3/2003
Pages: 86-87
Print publication date: 01/01/2003
ISSN (print): 0783-3660
ISSN (electronic): 0066-7676
Publisher: Suomen Arkkitehtiliitto
Notes: The review is in Finnish, with a short (three sentances) abstract in English.
