Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Tim Gray, Professor Selina Stead, Estelle Jones
Marine fish discarding has become a contentious environmental issue, but little attention has been paid to the moral grievances that sometimes underlie discarding practices. This article explores such a moral grievance through a case study of the under-10. m fishery in Sussex, England, where discarding of cod (Gadus morhua) has become a highly charged issue, skippers blaming it on unjust quota allocations. The moral claim to a greater quota allocation is analysed using two conceptions of distributive justice, entitlement and desert. The conclusion reached is that the under-10. m fleet's entitlement arguments for a higher quota are weaker than their desert arguments, but that entitlement arguments weigh more heavily than desert arguments with government when it allocates quota. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.
Author(s): Gray T, Korda R, Stead S, Jones E
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Marine Policy
Year: 2011
Volume: 35
Issue: 2
Pages: 122-129
Print publication date: 15/09/2010
Date deposited: 30/03/2013
ISSN (print): 0308-597X
ISSN (electronic): 1872-9460
Publisher: Pergamon
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.08.010
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.08.010
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric