Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Emerita Professor Erica Haimes, Professor Christoph Rehmann-Sutter
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The social interface between reproductive medicine and embryonic stem cell research has been investigated in a pilot study at a large IVF clinic in central China. Methods included observation, interviews with hospital personnel, and five in-depth qualitative interviews with women who underwent IVF and who were asked for their consent to the donation of embryos for use in medical (in fact human embryonic stem cell) research. This paper reports, and discusses from an ethical perspective, the results of an analysis of these interviews. The participants talked of extreme social pressure to become pregnant. Once they had a baby, 'spare' embryos lost practical significance due to the Chinese one-child policy. In the context of decision making about donating embryos to research, the women used the clinical distinctions between 'good and bad quality' embryos and also between frozen and transferred embryos, as guiding moral distinctions. In the absence of concrete information about what sort of research their embryos should be used for, the women interviewed either refused consent (for fear that the embryo would be given to another couple) or accepted, expressing motives of solidarity with other women in a similar situation. This reveals that they filled the knowledge gap with an image of research improving fertility treatment.
Author(s): Mitzkat A, Haimes E, Rehmann-Sutter C
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Medical Ethics
Year: 2010
Volume: 36
Issue: 12
Pages: 754-757
Print publication date: 27/10/2010
ISSN (print): 0306-6800
ISSN (electronic): 1473-4257
Publisher: BMJ Group
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.036764
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.036764
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
