Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Jill Francis, Professor Marie Johnston, Professor Martin Eccles, Professor Jeremy Grimshaw
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
In interview studies, sample size is often justified by interviewing participants until reaching 'data saturation'. However, there is no agreed method of establishing this. We propose principles for deciding saturation in theory-based interview studies (where conceptual categories are pre-established by existing theory). First, specify a minimum sample size for initial analysis (initial analysis sample). Second, specify how many more interviews will be conducted without new ideas emerging (stopping criterion). We demonstrate these principles in two studies, based on the theory of planned behaviour, designed to identify three belief categories (Behavioural, Normative and Control), using an initial analysis sample of 10 and stopping criterion of 3. Study 1 (retrospective analysis of existing data) identified 84 shared beliefs of 14 general medical practitioners about managing patients with sore throat without prescribing antibiotics. The criterion for saturation was achieved for Normative beliefs but not for other beliefs or studywise saturation. In Study 2 (prospective analysis), 17 relatives of people with Paget's disease of the bone reported 44 shared beliefs about taking genetic testing. Studywise data saturation was achieved at interview 17. We propose specification of these principles for reporting data saturation in theory-based interview studies. The principles may be adaptable for other types of studies.
Author(s): Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Psychology & Health
Year: 2010
Volume: 25
Issue: 10
Pages: 1229-1245
Print publication date: 01/12/2010
ISSN (print): 0887-0446
ISSN (electronic): 1476-8321
Publisher: Routledge
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015
DOI: 10.1080/08870440903194015
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric