Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr John Rose
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Aortic stent-grafts were introduced at the beginning of the 1990s as a less invasive method of dealing with aortic aneurysms in patients with poor cardiovascular reserve. The numbers of procedures performed worldwide has increased exponentially despite the current lack of any substantial evidence for long-term efficacy in comparison with the gold standard of open surgical grafting. This review summarizes the evolution of the abdominal aortic stent-graft, the techniques used for assessment and deployment, and the effect of the procedure on both the patient and the device. The recent publication of two national multicenter trials has confirmed that the endovascular technique confers a 2.5-fold reduction in 30-day mortality in comparison with open surgery. However, over 4 years of follow-up, there is a 3-fold increase in the risk of reintervention and the overall costs are 30% greater with endovascular repair. Although the improvement in aneurysm-related mortality persists in the mid-term, because of the initial reduction in perioperative mortality, the all-cause mortality rate at 4 years is actually no better than for open surgery. Longer-term data from the randomized trials are awaited as well as results from the latest trials utilizing state-of-the-art devices. Whilst the overall management of abdominal aortic aneurysms has undoubtedly benefited from the introduction of stent-grafts, open repair currently remains the gold standard treatment.
Author(s): Rose J
Publication type: Review
Publication status: Published
Journal: Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
Year: 2006
Volume: 29
Issue: 3
Pages: 332-343
ISSN (print): 0174-1551
ISSN (electronic): 1432-086X
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-005-0059-3
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-005-0059-3
